A couple of quick thoughts and queries on the extraordinary events today.
1) If you sent a confidential e-mail to your employer, and then found the contents of that e-mail made public, regardless of the circumstances, wouldn't you feel that you had suitable grounds to take said employer to the cleaners?
2) One of the charges against Inzamam was 'bringing the game into disrepute'. I'd say the actions outlined in 1) above by the ICC do that.
3) What on earth did the ICC think they were going to achieve?
4) ICC head, Malcolm Speed, was quoted as saying that he thought Darryl Hair believed he was 'acting in the best interests of the game.' So what;s your defence Malcolm?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment